Monthly Archive for July, 2005

HP 6

Just so I can chime in on the whole thing, I’m hereby announcing that I’ve already bought the 6th installment of the Harry Potter saga. I haven’t come around to reading a single page yet, since I’ve been a bit busy finishing that dreadful paper. And at the moment I’m reading Digital Fortress by Dan Brown, which, somehow unexpectedly, is a bit of a disappointment. It’s heavily clichéd, and although it’s set in an environment I’m not totally unfamilier with (namely computers…well, actually it’s cryptography, but since I couldn’t decipher code encrypted with a one time pad even if I had the decription pad, I wrote “computers”), the whole thing seems contrived; and somehow I got the impression that Brown’s research for that book was a bit shoddy. Oh well, I’ll be finishing that one off tonight, and then I’ll be free to enoy the newest adventure of the young magician wizard.

By the way, even if I hadn’t read the last five of the HP saga, I’d probably start reading now, after finding out that God’s Rottweiler is not fond of HP at all. Quoted from a letter written when he was still a cardinal:

It is good that you enlighten people about Harry Potter, because these are subtle seductions which act unnoticed and by this deeply distort Christianity in the soul, before it can grow properly. (link)

I don’t think there’s anything better than fighting your innate Christianity seed with a good dose of Harry Potter.

How to pull off the posting of a cheesy picture

Finding excitement in boredom, that’s what my site was originally about. Usually, that’s quite easy, because I tend to write about things only a handful of people are interested in. Today, I’ll break the rule of boredom, and post something which will be of interest to everyone out there: Lake Constance, during the late afternoon, shot by myself, right after stumbling out of the factory; rivets, screws and grease barrels still on my mind. Undoubtedly, every person seeing that picture will be delighted beyond usual delight, and excitement about my skills as a photographer will blow away any remnants of boredom still lingering in people’s minds.

Well, here it is, the picture:

sunny lake

Oh dear

Vienna’s archbishop, cardinal Schönborn, is under heavy fire after openly refuting Darwin’s theory of evolution in a NY Times interview, claiming it’s “just one of many theories” . He’s also criticized that the theory of evolution has become a dogma which nobody is allowed to question. Which, coming from a clergyman, is so ridiculous that I still can’t believe he actually said it. I mean, who else than the Roman Catholic Church is built on a foundation of dogmas nobody should ever question? And since I’m at it, when will those critics of the theory of evolution ever realize that a theory is not a hypothesis? Here’s a quick definition for “theory”, pulled off of Princeton’s Wordnet:

a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena

And here’s a definition for “hypothesis”:

a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena;

Now, when criticizing the theory of evolution, people like Schönborn think they can at the same time elevate bullshit like Intelligent Design to the same level, and call it a theory as well. But ultimately, Intelligent Design is but a hypothesis, without anything of it being verified, because, well, it’s based on a fairy tale. On the other hand, there’s the theory of evolution, which is based on overwhelming scientific substance matter, thus actually qualifying as an explanation of why the heck we are who we are. Read this letter to the Kansas schoolboard for an entertaining explanation of why teaching Intelligent Design to children is so very wrong.

In the end, I’m just glad Schönborn has finally proven how deranged he really is. I wonder if he’ll ever be invited to partake in a commitee on education ever again.

NIN Only

I stumbled upon Nine Inch Nails’ new video to “Only” from their fabulous “With Teeth” album. It’s an elegant little number, (purportedly) directed by David Fincher of “Fight Club” and “Seven” fame. Check out the video here.

The Da Vinci Code - The Movie

I just finished reading “The Da Vinci Code”, and while doing a bit of research online to check some facts (or myths), I stumbled upon the notice that Ron Howard has picked up the script to turn it into a movie. Well, I went to IMDB to check out the cast, and it would be a severe understatement to say that I was surprised. Now, if you’re familiar with the book, and I’m positive most of you are, then you’ve probably painted some mental pictures of the characters. Right, so whom exactly would you cast as Robert Langdon? I think one of the best would be someone like Billy Bob Thornton. Put him in a suit and he’s your average Harvard scholar (don’t believe me? Watch “The man who wasn’t there”). Well, that would be one of the ideal choices, but even if I’m opting for second, third, fourth choice…why on earth would I cast Tom Hanks for the role of Robert Langdon? While Hanks may be a fine actor, is it really necessary to cast him for every role, regardless of the total lack of credibility?

And here’s another one: Sir Leigh Teabing. In the book he’s a fat historian, obsessed with the Holy Grail, who’s got antiquated manners and is ultimately not the full sandwich. Once again, adhering to what the novel tells us is not an option for the producers. They rather decided to choose an actor who may be well-versed in what he does, but does neither bring the necessary physique nor the air of ambiguity you’d expect: Ian McKellen. Sure, he’s probably the hottest choice for mystery/fantasy vehicles at the moment, but does he really need to be cast for every role, regardless of the lack of credibility?

Finally, the French policeman. Now, this is actually too ridiculous to waste too many words on. Think French, think policeman, think gruff: Yeah, they cast Jean Reno. Again, Reno is a fine actor, he’s got his gruffness down, but hell, did anyone of the people involved actually read that novel? Here’s a quote from the book:

Captain Bezu Fache carried himself like an angry ox, with his wide shoulders thrown back and his chin tucked hard into his chest. His dark hair was slicked back with oil, accentuating an arrow-like peak that divided his jutting brow and preceded him like the prow of a battleship.

Does that sound like Jean Reno to you? Exactly! Hell, after losing a few pounds and some dyed hair, even Gerard Depardieu would fit that description better than Jean Reno. And by the way, according to the CIA Factbook, France has a population of over 60 million people. Roughly 24 of these are men older than 14. My guess is that among these 24 million men there must be an actor who is fairly fluent in English, not total shit, and not Jean Reno (and fits the damn description).

Well, here’s the link to the IMDB listing, just in case you think I’ve made all that up.




Stormgrass is powered by WordPress 2.6.1 and K2